winning: was war

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.44
, winner
Weight: 0.43
, program
Weight: 0.42
Siblings win
Weight: 0.32
, victory
Weight: 0.31
, playing game
Weight: 0.30
, play game
Weight: 0.30
, home run
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
was war 1.00
was french war 0.80
was on union soil important to war effort 0.78
was on union soil important to confederate war effort 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(winning, was war)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(winning, was french war)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(winning, was french war)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(winning, was french war)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(winning, was french war)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(winning, was on union soil important to confederate war effort)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(winning, was on union soil important to war effort)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(winning, was on union soil important to war effort)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(winning, was on union soil important to confederate war effort)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(winning, was on union soil important to war effort)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(winning, was on union soil important to confederate war effort)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(winning, was on union soil important to war effort)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(winning, was on union soil important to confederate war effort)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(winning, was war)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(winning, was war)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(winning, was war)