winnipeg: be colder than edmonton

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents canada
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.55
, city
Weight: 0.54
Siblings montreal
Weight: 0.35
, alberta
Weight: 0.34
, toronto
Weight: 0.34
, alaska
Weight: 0.34
, quebec
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be colder than edmonton 1.00
be hotter than vancouver 0.85
be hotter in summer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(city, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(city, be hotter in summer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(city, be hotter in summer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(city, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(winnipeg, be hotter than vancouver)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, be hotter than vancouver)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(winnipeg, be hotter than vancouver)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, be hotter than vancouver)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(city, be hotter in summer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(city, be hotter in summer)