winnipeg: be hotter in summer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents canada
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.55
, city
Weight: 0.54
Siblings montreal
Weight: 0.35
, alberta
Weight: 0.34
, toronto
Weight: 0.34
, alaska
Weight: 0.34
, quebec
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hotter in summer 1.00
be hotter than vancouver 0.83
is hot 0.79
be colder than edmonton 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(city, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(city, be hotter in summer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(city, be hotter in summer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(city, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(winnipeg, be hotter than vancouver)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, be hotter than vancouver)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(winnipeg, be hotter than vancouver)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(winnipeg, is hot)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, be colder than edmonton)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(winnipeg, is hot)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, is hot)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is hot)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, be hotter than vancouver)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(city, be hotter in summer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(city, be hotter in summer)