winter: be in houston texas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cold weather
Weight: 0.72
, season
Weight: 0.63
, summer
Weight: 0.63
, month
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ice skating
Weight: 0.66
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.66
, winter solstice
Weight: 0.65
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.63
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in houston texas 1.00
be in florida 0.84
be in denver 0.83
be in europe 0.78
be in japan 0.78
victoria bc 0.78
be in japan hot 0.77
be important in europe 0.76
be in patagonia from june through september 0.76
be best time go to spain 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cold weather, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(winter, be in houston texas)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(summer, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(winter, be in houston texas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(summer, be best time go to spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(winter, be in houston texas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(summer, be in florida)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(summer, be best time go to spain)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cold weather, be in florida)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(summer, be in florida)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cold weather, be in florida)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(summer, be best time go to spain)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, be important in europe)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cold weather, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(winter, be in houston texas)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(summer, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(winter, be in houston texas)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(summer, be best time go to spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(winter, be in houston texas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(ice hockey, be important in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, be important in europe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(winter, be in houston texas)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(winter, be in florida)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(winter, be in florida)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(winter, be in florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(winter, be in patagonia from june through september)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(winter, be in patagonia from june through september)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(winter, be in patagonia from june through september)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(winter, be in florida)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(winter, be in patagonia from june through september)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(winter, be in houston texas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(winter, be in houston texas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(summer, be in florida)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cold weather, be in florida)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(summer, be best time go to spain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ice hockey, be important in europe)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(summer, be in florida)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(summer, be best time go to spain)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(winter, be in houston texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cold weather, be in florida)