winter: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cold weather
Weight: 0.72
, season
Weight: 0.63
, summer
Weight: 0.63
, month
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ice skating
Weight: 0.66
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.66
, winter solstice
Weight: 0.65
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.63
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
go bad 0.79
is 13 bad season 0.77
is bad season 0.77
is terrible 0.77
be put down in terms of quality 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cold weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(winter, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(summer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(winter, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(summer, is bad season) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(winter, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(summer, is bad season)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(cold weather, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(summer, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(summer, is bad season)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cold weather, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(summer, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(winter solstice, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cold weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(winter, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(summer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(winter, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(summer, is bad season) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(winter, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(winter solstice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(winter solstice, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(winter, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(winter, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(winter, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(winter, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(winter, is bad season)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(winter, is bad season)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(winter, is bad season)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(winter, is bad season)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(winter, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(summer, is bad season)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(summer, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cold weather, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(winter solstice, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cold weather, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(summer, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(winter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(summer, is bad season)