winter: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cold weather
Weight: 0.72
, season
Weight: 0.63
, summer
Weight: 0.63
, month
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ice skating
Weight: 0.66
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.66
, winter solstice
Weight: 0.65
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.63
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
be put down in terms of quality 0.78
is great season 0.77
is good season 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(summer, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(winter, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cold weather, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(winter, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(summer, is good season)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(winter, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(summer, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(cold weather, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(summer, is good season)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cold weather, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(summer, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(summer, is good season)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(winter solstice, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(summer, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(winter, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cold weather, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(winter, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(summer, is good season)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(winter, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(winter solstice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(winter solstice, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(winter, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(winter, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(winter, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(winter, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(winter, is great season)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(winter, is great season)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(winter, is great season)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(winter, is good season)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(winter, is good season)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(winter, is good season)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(winter, is great season)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(winter, is good season)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(winter, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(summer, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cold weather, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(summer, is good season)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(winter solstice, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(summer, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cold weather, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(winter, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(summer, is good season)