wisconsin: be bad place live

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.57
, university
Weight: 0.56
, republican
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.66
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, minneapolis
Weight: 0.55
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.46
, michigan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad place live 1.00
be good place live 0.97
be good place visit 0.81
is bad state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, be good place live)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be good place live)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, be good place live)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(pennsylvania, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, be good place live)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(minneapolis, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, be good place live)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ohio, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ohio, be good place live)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(wisconsin, be bad place live)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be good place live)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be good place live)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be good place live)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be good place visit)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be good place visit)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(wisconsin, be good place live)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be good place visit)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(wisconsin, be good place visit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be bad place live)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be bad place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be good place live)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(minneapolis, be good place live)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ohio, be good place live)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be bad place live)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)