wisconsin: be in midwest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.57
, university
Weight: 0.56
, republican
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.66
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, minneapolis
Weight: 0.55
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.46
, michigan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in midwest 1.00
be called midwest 0.98
be considered midwest 0.96
is america 's dairyland 0.76
be called america 's dairyland 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be in midwest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called midwest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be called midwest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in midwest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ohio, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ohio, be in midwest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(michigan, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(michigan, be in midwest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ohio, be called midwest)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called midwest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(michigan, be called midwest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(michigan, be called midwest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(wisconsin, be in midwest)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be called midwest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(wisconsin, be called midwest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be called midwest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be considered midwest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(wisconsin, be considered midwest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be called midwest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is america 's dairyland)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is america 's dairyland)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be called america 's dairyland)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is america 's dairyland)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be called america 's dairyland)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(wisconsin, be called america 's dairyland)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be called america 's dairyland)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is america 's dairyland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be in midwest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(michigan, be in midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(michigan, be called midwest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be in midwest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ohio, be called midwest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered midwest)