wisconsin: is bad state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.57
, university
Weight: 0.56
, republican
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.66
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, minneapolis
Weight: 0.55
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.46
, michigan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad state 1.00
has state state 0.85
is best state 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
be bad place live 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is best state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(michigan, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(michigan, is best state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is bad state)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be bad place live)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(wisconsin, be bad place live)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(wisconsin, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be bad place live)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, has state state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be bad place live)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is best state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is best state)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(wisconsin, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is best state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(michigan, is best state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)