wisdom: contribute to technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virtue
Weight: 0.69
, knowledge
Weight: 0.67
, power
Weight: 0.62
, value
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.61
Siblings kindness
Weight: 0.62
, humility
Weight: 0.35
, compassion
Weight: 0.35
, courage
Weight: 0.35
, faith
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
contribute to technology 1.00
contribute to acquisition of science 0.79
contribute to acquisition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(wisdom, contribute to technology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(knowledge, contribute to acquisition of science)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(wisdom, contribute to technology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(knowledge, contribute to technology)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(knowledge, contribute to acquisition of science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, contribute to acquisition of science)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, contribute to technology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wisdom, contribute to technology)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(knowledge, contribute to acquisition of science)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wisdom, contribute to technology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(wisdom, contribute to technology)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(wisdom, contribute to acquisition of science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wisdom, contribute to acquisition)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(wisdom, contribute to acquisition of science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(wisdom, contribute to acquisition)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wisdom, contribute to acquisition of science)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(wisdom, contribute to acquisition)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(wisdom, contribute to acquisition)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(wisdom, contribute to acquisition of science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(wisdom, contribute to technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(wisdom, contribute to technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(knowledge, contribute to technology)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(knowledge, contribute to acquisition of science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(knowledge, contribute to technology)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(wisdom, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(knowledge, contribute to acquisition of science)