witness: answer question from barrister

Related concepts

Parents	defendant Weight: 0.65 , other person Weight: 0.63 , trial Weight: 0.62 , man Weight: 0.61
Siblings	policeman Weight: 0.63 , attorney Weight: 0.61 , juror Weight: 0.54 , caller Weight: 0.52 , young man Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
answer question from barrister	1.00
doubt lawyer	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(witness, answer question from barrister) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(juror, doubt lawyer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.26

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(witness, answer question from barrister) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(juror, doubt lawyer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(juror, doubt lawyer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(witness, answer question from barrister) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(witness, answer question from barrister)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(witness, answer question from barrister) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(witness, answer question from barrister) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(witness, answer question from barrister)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(witness, answer question from barrister) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(witness, answer question from barrister)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(witness, answer question from barrister) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(juror, doubt lawyer)