wok: be better than frying pan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, pan
Weight: 0.56
, cooking
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, equipment
Weight: 0.51
Siblings frying pan
Weight: 0.38
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.37
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.37
, skillet
Weight: 0.37
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than frying pan 1.00
be better than pan 0.91
be used in cooking 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wok, be better than frying pan)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(wok, be better than frying pan)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(wok, be better than frying pan)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wok, be used in cooking)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(wok, be better than frying pan)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(wok, be better than pan)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(wok, be better than frying pan)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(wok, be better than pan)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wok, be better than frying pan)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(wok, be better than pan)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wok, be better than frying pan)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(wok, be used in cooking)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(wok, be better than frying pan)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wok, be better than pan)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(wok, be better than frying pan)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(wok, be used in cooking)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(wok, be better than frying pan)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wok, be used in cooking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(wok, be better than frying pan)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(wok, be better than frying pan)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wok, be better than frying pan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wok, be better than frying pan)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(wok, be better than frying pan)