wolf: be like dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, predator
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings husky
Weight: 0.46
, dingo
Weight: 0.46
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39
, elk
Weight: 0.39
, cougar
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like dogs 1.00
is dogs 0.95
be different to dogs 0.95
be different from dogs 0.93
hate dogs 0.93
be same as dogs 0.92
feel about dogs 0.92
be related to dogs 0.91
be afraid of dogs 0.91
eat dogs 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cougar, eat dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cougar, eat dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(cougar, eat dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(wolf, be like dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(wolf, eat dogs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wolf, eat dogs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wolf, eat dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(wolf, be same as dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wolf, eat dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(wolf, be same as dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(wolf, be different from dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(wolf, be different from dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(wolf, be related to dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(wolf, be related to dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wolf, be different from dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(wolf, be same as dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wolf, be different from dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wolf, be same as dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(wolf, be related to dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(wolf, be related to dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wolf, be like dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wolf, be like dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wolf, be like dogs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cougar, eat dogs)