wombat: have back to pouches

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.61
, marsupial
Weight: 0.56
, species
Weight: 0.55
, wildlife
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.45
Siblings cassowary
Weight: 0.36
, hedgehog
Weight: 0.35
, koala
Weight: 0.35
, dingo
Weight: 0.35
, wallaby
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have back to pouches 1.00
have back to front pouches 0.97
has physical part pouches 0.95
have backwards pouches 0.94
has pouch 0.86
has physical part pouch 0.85
have backwards pouch 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(marsupial, has physical part pouches)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wombat, have back to pouches)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(marsupial, has physical part pouch)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wombat, have back to pouches)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(marsupial, has pouch)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wombat, have back to pouches)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(marsupial, has physical part pouches)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(marsupial, has pouch)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(marsupial, has physical part pouch)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, has physical part pouches)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, has physical part pouch)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, has pouch)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(wallaby, has physical part pouches)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(marsupial, has physical part pouches)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(marsupial, has physical part pouch)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(marsupial, has pouch)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(wallaby, has physical part pouches)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wallaby, has physical part pouches)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(wombat, have back to pouches)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(wombat, have back to front pouches)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(wombat, has physical part pouches)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouches)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(wombat, has physical part pouches)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wombat, has physical part pouches)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wombat, has physical part pouches)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(wombat, has pouch)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(wombat, have back to front pouches)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(wombat, have back to front pouches)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wombat, have back to front pouches)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(wombat, have backwards pouch)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wombat, have backwards pouches)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(wombat, has pouch)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(wombat, have backwards pouches)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(wombat, have backwards pouch)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(wombat, have backwards pouch)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouches)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(wombat, has pouch)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wombat, have backwards pouch)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wombat, has pouch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wombat, have back to pouches)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(marsupial, has pouch)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(marsupial, has physical part pouches)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(marsupial, has physical part pouch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wallaby, has physical part pouches)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(marsupial, has physical part pouches)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(marsupial, has pouch)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(wombat, have back to pouches)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(marsupial, has physical part pouch)