wood: be better conductor than plastic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, substrate
Weight: 0.63
, fence
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.40
, lumber
Weight: 0.38
, timber
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better conductor than plastic 1.00
be better than plastic 0.87
be better than metal fortnite 0.82
feel warmer than metal 0.78
be warmer than metal 0.78
be hotter than metal 0.76
be cheaper than wood 0.76
be cheaper than hard wood 0.76
wainscoting more expensive than plastic 0.75
be more expensive than wood 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(steel, be better than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(steel, be better than plastic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(wood, be better conductor than plastic)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(wood, be better than plastic)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(wood, be better than plastic)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(wood, be better than plastic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(wood, be warmer than metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(wood, be warmer than metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(wood, be warmer than metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(wood, be hotter than metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wood, be hotter than metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(wood, be hotter than metal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(wood, be warmer than metal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wood, be better than plastic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wood, be hotter than metal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wood, be better conductor than plastic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wood, be better conductor than plastic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wood, be better conductor than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(steel, be better than plastic)