wood: be considered composite material

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, substrate
Weight: 0.63
, fence
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.40
, lumber
Weight: 0.38
, timber
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered composite material 1.00
be considered material 0.87
be as material used 0.85
be as material 0.84
is material 0.84
is good material 0.83
be best material in fortnite 0.82
use than other material 0.81
is building material 0.81
is useful material 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wood, be considered composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(timber, is building material)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wood, be considered composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(timber, is material)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(wood, be considered composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(timber, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(timber, is material)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(wood, be considered composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(timber, is building material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(timber, is building material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(wood, be considered composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(wood, be considered composite material)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(wood, be considered composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wood, is good material)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(wood, be considered composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(wood, is good material)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(wood, be considered composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(wood, is good material)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(wood, be considered composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wood, is good material)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(wood, be considered composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wood, be considered composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wood, be considered composite material)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(wood, be considered composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wood, be considered composite material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wood, be considered composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(timber, is material)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wood, be considered composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(timber, is building material)