wood: be poor conductor of electricity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, substrate
Weight: 0.63
, fence
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.40
, lumber
Weight: 0.38
, timber
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be poor conductor of electricity 1.00
be poor conductor of heat 0.92
be bad conductor of heat 0.87
be good conductor of heat 0.87
be better conductor of heat 0.86
be good insulators of electricity 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(steel, be poor conductor of heat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(steel, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(steel, be poor conductor of heat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(wood, be poor conductor of electricity)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(wood, be good insulators of electricity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good insulators of electricity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wood, be good insulators of electricity)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(wood, be poor conductor of heat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wood, be bad conductor of heat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(wood, be poor conductor of heat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(wood, be bad conductor of heat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wood, be good insulators of electricity)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good conductor of heat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wood, be better conductor of heat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wood, be bad conductor of heat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(wood, be poor conductor of heat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wood, be poor conductor of heat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wood, be bad conductor of heat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wood, be better conductor of heat)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wood, be good conductor of heat)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(wood, be better conductor of heat)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wood, be better conductor of heat)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(wood, be good conductor of heat)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wood, be good conductor of heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wood, be poor conductor of electricity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(wood, be poor conductor of electricity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(steel, be poor conductor of heat)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wood, be poor conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)