wooden spoon: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.81
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.78
, utensil
Weight: 0.77
, spoon
Weight: 0.70
, kitchen
Weight: 0.69
Siblings spatula
Weight: 0.38
, ladle
Weight: 0.38
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.38
, knife
Weight: 0.38
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality use 0.86
has quality worth 0.82
be bad for environment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(utensil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(utensil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spoon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(utensil, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(utensil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(utensil, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality use)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spoon, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality worth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality use)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(knife, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(utensil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(utensil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spoon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(utensil, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(utensil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(knife, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(knife, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(knife, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(knife, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(wooden spoon, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality use)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality worth)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(utensil, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(knife, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(knife, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality use)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(utensil, be bad for environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality worth)