woodpecker: have long beak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, bird
Weight: 0.52
Siblings chickadee
Weight: 0.43
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long beak 1.00
has physical part beak 0.95
have strong pointed beak 0.88
have long beaks 0.87
has physical part beaks 0.83
need beaks 0.82
use beaks 0.82
have sharp beaks 0.81
need strong beaks 0.81
have short strong fan tail feathers 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beak)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have long beak)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beak)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beak)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beak)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beak)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(woodpecker, use beaks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, use beaks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(woodpecker, use beaks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(woodpecker, need beaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(woodpecker, need beaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(woodpecker, need strong beaks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have short strong fan tail feathers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(woodpecker, need strong beaks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, need strong beaks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need strong beaks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, use beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)