woodpecker: have long beaks

Related concepts

Parents	species Weight: 0.65 , wildlife Weight: 0.65 , creature Weight: 0.64 , bird Weight: 0.52
Siblings	chickadee Weight: 0.43 , peregrine falcon Weight: 0.37 , tree frog Weight: 0.37 , lizard Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have long beaks	1.00
need beaks	0.96
use beaks	0.96
has physical part beaks	0.94
need strong beaks	0.93
have sharp beaks	0.93
have pointed beaks	0.90
have long beak	0.87
have pointed chisel like beaks	0.84
has physical part beak	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks)

Similarity expansion

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(woodpecker, use beaks)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, use beaks)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(woodpecker, need beaks)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Salient(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(woodpecker, use beaks)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(woodpecker, have pointed beaks)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(woodpecker, need strong beaks)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(woodpecker, need beaks)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(woodpecker, need strong beaks)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, need strong beaks)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beak)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beak)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have pointed beaks)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(woodpecker, have pointed chisel like beaks)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beak)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(woodpecker, have pointed beaks)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need strong beaks)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(woodpecker, have pointed chisel like beaks)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(woodpecker, have long beak)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beak)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have pointed chisel like beaks)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have pointed chisel like beaks)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have pointed beaks)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, use beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)