woodpecker: need beaks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, bird
Weight: 0.52
Siblings chickadee
Weight: 0.43
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
need beaks 1.00
use beaks 0.98
have long beaks 0.96
need strong beaks 0.95
has physical part beaks 0.94
have sharp beaks 0.92
have pointed beaks 0.90
have pointed chisel like beaks 0.84
have long beak 0.82
has physical part beak 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(woodpecker, need beaks)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(woodpecker, need beaks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(woodpecker, need beaks)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(woodpecker, use beaks)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(woodpecker, use beaks)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, use beaks)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need strong beaks)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, use beaks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(woodpecker, need strong beaks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have pointed beaks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have pointed chisel like beaks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have pointed beaks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beak)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beak)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have pointed chisel like beaks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, need strong beaks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have long beak)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have pointed beaks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beak)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have pointed beaks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have pointed chisel like beaks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(woodpecker, need strong beaks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beak)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have pointed chisel like beaks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(woodpecker, need beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(woodpecker, need beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)