woodwind: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents musical instrument
Weight: 0.65
, instrument
Weight: 0.61
, ensemble
Weight: 0.59
, wind instrument
Weight: 0.57
, brass instrument
Weight: 0.46
Siblings bass clarinet
Weight: 0.72
, saxophone
Weight: 0.68
, piccolo
Weight: 0.59
, bassoon
Weight: 0.57
, sax
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
has quality cost 0.82
has quality evil 0.78
turn good 0.77
become good 0.76
has quality questions 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wind instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(woodwind, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(woodwind, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(woodwind, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(brass instrument, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(woodwind, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(brass instrument, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(woodwind, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(brass instrument, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(woodwind, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(wind instrument, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, is quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(piccolo, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(piccolo, has quality evil)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality cost)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(piccolo, become good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(piccolo, turn good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wind instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(woodwind, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(woodwind, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(woodwind, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(brass instrument, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(woodwind, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(brass instrument, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(woodwind, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(brass instrument, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(woodwind, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(piccolo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(piccolo, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(saxophone, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(saxophone, has quality cost)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(piccolo, turn good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(piccolo, turn good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(piccolo, become good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(piccolo, become good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(piccolo, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(piccolo, has quality evil)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(saxophone, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(saxophone, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(woodwind, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(woodwind, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wind instrument, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(piccolo, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(piccolo, turn good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(saxophone, has quality cost)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(piccolo, become good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(piccolo, has quality evil)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(saxophone, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wind instrument, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(woodwind, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, is quality)