woodwind: is instrument

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents musical instrument
Weight: 0.65
, instrument
Weight: 0.61
, ensemble
Weight: 0.59
, wind instrument
Weight: 0.57
, brass instrument
Weight: 0.46
Siblings bass clarinet
Weight: 0.72
, saxophone
Weight: 0.68
, piccolo
Weight: 0.59
, bassoon
Weight: 0.57
, sax
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
is instrument 1.00
be called instruments 0.89
is woodwind instrument 0.88
be called brass instruments 0.84
transpose instruments 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(instrument, be called instruments)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(woodwind, is instrument)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brass instrument, be called brass instruments)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(woodwind, is instrument)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(instrument, be called instruments)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, be called brass instruments)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be called instruments)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, be called brass instruments)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is woodwind instrument)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, transpose instruments)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(instrument, be called instruments)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(woodwind, is instrument)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brass instrument, be called brass instruments)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(woodwind, is instrument)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(saxophone, is woodwind instrument)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(saxophone, is woodwind instrument)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(saxophone, transpose instruments)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(saxophone, transpose instruments)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(woodwind, is instrument)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, is instrument)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(woodwind, is instrument)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(instrument, be called instruments)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(brass instrument, be called brass instruments)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(saxophone, transpose instruments)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(saxophone, is woodwind instrument)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(instrument, be called instruments)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(woodwind, is instrument)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(brass instrument, be called brass instruments)