work: requires be on time

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hard work
Weight: 0.61
, depth
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.60
, adventure
Weight: 0.60
Siblings think
Weight: 0.65
, trust
Weight: 0.63
, education
Weight: 0.63
, stand
Weight: 0.61
, execution
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires be on time 1.00
take time 0.82
requires energh 0.81
requires do 0.80
requires do it right 0.79
requires know something first 0.77
requires get up early 0.77
requires get go 0.76
requires think 0.75
requires apply for job 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(think, take time)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(think, requires do)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(think, requires think)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(think, requires do)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(think, requires do)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(think, requires think)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(think, requires think)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(think, take time)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(think, take time)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(work, requires be on time)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(work, requires energh)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(work, requires energh)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(work, requires energh)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(work, requires energh)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(work, requires be on time)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(work, requires be on time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(think, requires do)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(think, requires think)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(work, requires be on time)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(think, take time)