worker: avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, poor people
Weight: 0.61
, supervisor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.88
, office worker
Weight: 0.81
, nurse
Weight: 0.71
, janitor
Weight: 0.71
, bus driver
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity 1.00
avoid damage from static electricity 0.89
be on assembly line affected by computers 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(worker, avoid damage from static electricity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(worker, avoid damage from static electricity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(worker, avoid damage from static electricity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(worker, be on assembly line affected by computers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(worker, avoid damage from static electricity)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(worker, be on assembly line affected by computers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(worker, be on assembly line affected by computers)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(worker, be on assembly line affected by computers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(worker, avoid computer chips damaged by static electricity)