worker: be in food industry use

Related concepts

Parents	employee Weight: 0.66 , person Weight: 0.63 , poor people Weight: 0.61 , supervisor Weight: 0.60
Siblings	construction worker Weight: 0.88 , office worker Weight: 0.81 , nurse Weight: 0.71 , janitor Weight: 0.71 , bus driver Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in food industry use	1.00
be in silk industry	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(worker, be in food industry use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(worker, be in food industry use)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(worker, be in food industry use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(worker, be in silk industry)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(worker, be in food industry use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(worker, be in silk industry)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(worker, be in food industry use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(worker, be in silk industry)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(worker, be in food industry use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(worker, be in silk industry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(worker, be in food industry use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(worker, be in food industry use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(worker, be in food industry use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(worker, be in food industry use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(worker, be in food industry use)