worker: be in silk industry

Related concepts

Parents	employee Weight: 0.66 , person Weight: 0.63 , poor people Weight: 0.61 , supervisor Weight: 0.60
Siblings	construction worker Weight: 0.88 , office worker Weight: 0.81 , nurse Weight: 0.71 , janitor Weight: 0.71 , bus driver Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in silk industry	1.00
be in food industry use	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(worker, be in silk industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(worker, be in silk industry)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(worker, be in silk industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(worker, be in food industry use)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(worker, be in silk industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(worker, be in food industry use)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(worker, be in silk industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(worker, be in food industry use)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(worker, be in silk industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(worker, be in food industry use)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(worker, be in silk industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(worker, be in silk industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(worker, be in silk industry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(worker, be in silk industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(worker, be in silk industry)