worker: form union

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, man
Weight: 0.60
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.88
, nurse
Weight: 0.71
, janitor
Weight: 0.71
, bus driver
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
form union 1.00
join union 0.89
strike job 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(employee, join union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(worker, form union)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(employee, join union)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(employee, join union)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(employee, join union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(worker, form union)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(worker, form union)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(worker, join union)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(worker, join union)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(worker, join union)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(worker, strike job)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(worker, strike job)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(worker, join union)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(worker, strike job)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(worker, strike job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(worker, form union)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(worker, form union)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(employee, join union)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(worker, form union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(employee, join union)