worker: get paid less

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, poor people
Weight: 0.61
, supervisor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.88
, office worker
Weight: 0.81
, nurse
Weight: 0.71
, janitor
Weight: 0.71
, bus driver
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid less 1.00
get paid 0.93
get paid little 0.93
is paid little 0.92
is paid 0.90
be even are paid 0.89
be paid higher rate of pay 0.88
be paid rate of pay 0.87
be are paid 0.87
get paid working 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(janitor, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid little)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nurse, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(construction worker, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid little)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nurse, get paid)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(nurse, get paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(janitor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(janitor, get paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(worker, get paid less)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, is paid little)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(worker, be even are paid)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid working)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(worker, is paid little)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(worker, get paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(worker, get paid working)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(worker, be even are paid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(worker, is paid little)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(worker, is paid little)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(worker, get paid working)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(worker, get paid working)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(worker, get paid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(worker, be even are paid)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(worker, be even are paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid less)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(worker, get paid less)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid little)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nurse, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(janitor, get paid)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)