worker: were affected by economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, poor people
Weight: 0.61
, supervisor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.88
, office worker
Weight: 0.81
, nurse
Weight: 0.71
, janitor
Weight: 0.71
, bus driver
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
were affected by economy 1.00
were affected in 1920s 0.88
were affected by industrial revolution 0.82
be on assembly line affected by computers 0.77
were treated by big business 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(worker, were affected by economy)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(worker, were affected in 1920s)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(worker, were affected by industrial revolution)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(worker, were treated by big business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(worker, be on assembly line affected by computers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(worker, were affected by industrial revolution)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(worker, were affected in 1920s)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(worker, were treated by big business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(worker, be on assembly line affected by computers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(worker, were affected by industrial revolution)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(worker, were treated by big business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(worker, were affected in 1920s)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(worker, be on assembly line affected by computers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(worker, be on assembly line affected by computers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(worker, were treated by big business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(worker, were affected by industrial revolution)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(worker, were affected in 1920s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(worker, were affected by economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(worker, were affected by economy)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(worker, were affected by economy)