worker: were affected in 1920s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, poor people
Weight: 0.61
, supervisor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.88
, office worker
Weight: 0.81
, nurse
Weight: 0.71
, janitor
Weight: 0.71
, bus driver
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
were affected in 1920s 1.00
were affected by economy 0.88
were affected by industrial revolution 0.80
were affected by specialization 0.79
be on assembly line affected by computers 0.77
were going during 1800s 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(worker, were affected in 1920s)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(worker, were affected by economy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(worker, were affected by economy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(worker, were affected by economy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(worker, were affected by specialization)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(worker, were affected by industrial revolution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(worker, were going during 1800s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(worker, were going during 1800s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(worker, were affected by industrial revolution)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(worker, be on assembly line affected by computers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(worker, were affected by industrial revolution)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(worker, were affected by specialization)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(worker, were affected by industrial revolution)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(worker, were going during 1800s)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(worker, be on assembly line affected by computers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(worker, be on assembly line affected by computers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(worker, were going during 1800s)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(worker, were affected by specialization)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(worker, were affected by economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(worker, were affected by specialization)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(worker, be on assembly line affected by computers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(worker, were affected in 1920s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(worker, were affected in 1920s)