worker: were treated by big business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, poor people
Weight: 0.61
, supervisor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.88
, office worker
Weight: 0.81
, nurse
Weight: 0.71
, janitor
Weight: 0.71
, bus driver
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated by big business 1.00
be important in business 0.79
were treated during industrial revolution 0.78
were affected by economy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(worker, were treated by big business)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(worker, were treated during industrial revolution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(worker, were treated during industrial revolution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(worker, were treated during industrial revolution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(worker, were affected by economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(worker, were treated during industrial revolution)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(worker, be important in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(worker, were affected by economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(worker, be important in business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(worker, were affected by economy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(worker, be important in business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(worker, be important in business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(worker, were affected by economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(worker, were treated by big business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(worker, were treated by big business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(worker, were treated by big business)