worker: work for low pay

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, poor people
Weight: 0.61
, supervisor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.88
, office worker
Weight: 0.81
, nurse
Weight: 0.71
, janitor
Weight: 0.71
, bus driver
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
work for low pay 1.00
work for pay 0.93
be paid higher rate of pay 0.88
be paid rate of pay 0.87
be paid higher hourly rate of pay 0.85
get paid working 0.83
be paid higher rate 0.83
get paid 0.83
be paid hourly rate of pay 0.83
get paid less 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(janitor, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nurse, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nurse, get paid)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(nurse, get paid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(construction worker, get paid)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(construction worker, get paid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(janitor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(janitor, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(worker, work for low pay)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(worker, be paid higher hourly rate of pay)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(worker, be paid higher hourly rate of pay)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(worker, get paid working)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(worker, get paid less)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(worker, get paid working)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(worker, get paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(worker, get paid less)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(worker, be paid higher hourly rate of pay)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(worker, get paid working)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(worker, get paid less)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(worker, get paid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(worker, be paid higher hourly rate of pay)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid working)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid less)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(worker, work for low pay)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(worker, work for low pay)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nurse, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(worker, work for low pay)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(janitor, get paid)