:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Salient implies Plausible
0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(working, be adp)
⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(working, be adp)
Similarity expansion
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(working, be adp)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(working, be zumiez)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(working, be adp)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(working, be cvx)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(working, be adp)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(working, be cvx)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(working, be adp)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(working, be flipp)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(working, be adp)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(working, be flipp)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(working, be adp)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(working, be cvx)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(working, be adp)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(working, be csoki)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(working, be adp)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(working, be csoki)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(working, be adp)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(working, be cvx)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(working, be adp)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(working, be adp)