working: be as job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.55
, state
Weight: 0.51
, student
Weight: 0.51
, factor
Weight: 0.50
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.32
, talking
Weight: 0.31
, pushing
Weight: 0.31
, playing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be as job 1.00
be job now 0.95
has state job 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(playing, has state job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(playing, has state job)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(playing, has state job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(working, be as job)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(working, be job now)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(working, has state job)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(working, be job now)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(working, has state job)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(working, be job now)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(working, has state job)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(working, be job now)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(working, has state job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(working, be as job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(working, be as job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(working, be as job)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(playing, has state job)