working: be as team

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.55
, state
Weight: 0.51
, student
Weight: 0.51
, factor
Weight: 0.50
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.32
, talking
Weight: 0.31
, pushing
Weight: 0.31
, playing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be as team 1.00
be as team important 0.96
is team important 0.92
is team better 0.91
be as team member at carson 's 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(working, be as team)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(working, be as team important)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(working, be as team important)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(working, is team important)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(working, is team better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(working, is team better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(working, is team important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(working, be as team important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(working, be as team important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(working, is team important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(working, is team better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(working, is team important)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(working, is team better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(working, be as team)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(working, be as team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(working, be as team)