working: be bank using

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.55
, state
Weight: 0.51
, student
Weight: 0.51
, factor
Weight: 0.50
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.32
, talking
Weight: 0.31
, pushing
Weight: 0.31
, playing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bank using 1.00
be big investment bank 0.83
be deutsche bank 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(working, be bank using) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(working, be bank using)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(working, be bank using) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(working, be deutsche bank)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(working, be bank using) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(working, be deutsche bank)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(working, be bank using) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(working, be deutsche bank)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(working, be bank using) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(working, be deutsche bank)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(working, be bank using) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(working, be bank using) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(working, be bank using)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(working, be bank using) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(working, be bank using)