workman: is keyboard layout review

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.57
, employee
Weight: 0.56
, source
Weight: 0.49
, style
Weight: 0.47
, servant
Weight: 0.47
Siblings contractor
Weight: 0.63
, construction worker
Weight: 0.33
, wise man
Weight: 0.33
, worker
Weight: 0.33
, office worker
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is keyboard layout review 1.00
is keyboard layout 0.96
is layout 0.88
is keyboard 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(workman, is keyboard layout review)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(workman, is layout)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(workman, is keyboard layout)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(workman, is keyboard layout)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(workman, is keyboard layout)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(workman, is keyboard)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(workman, is keyboard)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(workman, is keyboard)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(workman, is keyboard layout)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(workman, is layout)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(workman, is keyboard)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(workman, is layout)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(workman, is layout)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(workman, is keyboard layout review)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(workman, is keyboard layout review)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(workman, is keyboard layout review)