write: be used to explain concept

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.55
, subject
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, file
Weight: 0.49
, activity
Weight: 0.44
Siblings read
Weight: 0.33
, read book
Weight: 0.32
, computer file
Weight: 0.31
, good book
Weight: 0.31
, think
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to explain concept 1.00
be used to get idea 0.81
be used to comunicating idea 0.81
be used to understand 0.81
be used to develop idea 0.81
be used to form new idea 0.80
causes understand it 0.80
causes have idea 0.80
causes idea 0.79
form idea 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(read, causes idea)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to form new idea)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to understand)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(read, be used to understand)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(think, causes have idea)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to get idea)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(read book, causes understand it)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(think, be used to get idea)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(think, be used to get idea)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(think, be used to develop idea)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(think, be used to form new idea)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(think, be used to form new idea)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(think, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(think, be used to understand)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(read book, causes understand it)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(read book, causes understand it)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(read, be used to understand)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(think, causes have idea)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(think, causes have idea)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(read, causes idea)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(read, causes idea)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(write, be used to explain concept)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(write, be used to explain concept)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(read, be used to understand)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(think, be used to get idea)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(think, be used to understand)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(read book, causes understand it)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(think, causes have idea)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(think, be used to develop idea)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(think, be used to form new idea)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(write, be used to explain concept)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(read, causes idea)