writer: use different types

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fan
Weight: 0.66
, philosopher
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.65
, scholar
Weight: 0.65
Siblings author
Weight: 0.73
, critic
Weight: 0.72
, journalist
Weight: 0.72
, poet
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
use different types 1.00
use types 0.97
use different types of sentences 0.83
use types of sentences 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(writer, use different types)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(writer, use types)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(writer, use types)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(writer, use types)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(writer, use different types of sentences)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(writer, use types)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(writer, use types of sentences)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(writer, use types of sentences)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(writer, use different types of sentences)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(writer, use types of sentences)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(writer, use types of sentences)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(writer, use different types of sentences)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(writer, use different types of sentences)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(writer, use different types)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(writer, use different types)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(writer, use different types)