writer: use literary devices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fan
Weight: 0.66
, philosopher
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.65
, scholar
Weight: 0.65
Siblings author
Weight: 0.73
, critic
Weight: 0.72
, journalist
Weight: 0.72
, poet
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
use literary devices 1.00
use devices 0.82
effectively set time in historical novels 0.76
abandon novels 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(author, use literary devices)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(poet, use literary devices)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(poet, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(poet, use literary devices)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(author, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(author, use literary devices)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(writer, use literary devices)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(writer, use devices)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(writer, use devices)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(writer, use devices)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(writer, abandon novels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(writer, effectively set time in historical novels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(writer, use devices)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(writer, abandon novels)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(writer, abandon novels)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(writer, effectively set time in historical novels)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(writer, abandon novels)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(writer, effectively set time in historical novels)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writer, effectively set time in historical novels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use literary devices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(writer, use literary devices)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(poet, use literary devices)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use literary devices)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(author, use literary devices)