writing: be described as art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be described as art 1.00
be described 0.88
be in art 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(matter, be described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(writing, be described as art)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(writing, be described as art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(matter, be described)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(writing, be described as art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(matter, be described)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(matter, be described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(writing, be described as art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(writing, be described as art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(writing, be described as art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(writing, be described as art)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(writing, be described as art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(writing, be in art)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(writing, be described as art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(writing, be in art)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(writing, be described as art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(writing, be in art)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(writing, be described as art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(writing, be in art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(writing, be described as art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(writing, be described as art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(writing, be described as art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(writing, be described as art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(writing, be described as art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(writing, be described as art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(matter, be described)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(writing, be described as art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(matter, be described)