writing: was important development to man

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important development to man 1.00
was important development to early man 0.96
was important in mesopotamia 0.82
was important to sumerians 0.81
was important to mayans 0.81
was important to mesopotamia 0.81
was important to development of egypt 0.81
was important for mesopotamians 0.81
was important to egyptians 0.76
was key invention for sumerians 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, was important development to man)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(writing, was important development to early man)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(writing, was important development to early man)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(writing, was important development to early man)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(writing, was important in mesopotamia)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was important to sumerians)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was important to mayans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, was important to development of egypt)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(writing, was important for mesopotamians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writing, was important in mesopotamia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(writing, was important to sumerians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(writing, was important to mayans)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(writing, was important to development of egypt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writing, was important for mesopotamians)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important development to early man)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(writing, was important in mesopotamia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to sumerians)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to mayans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to development of egypt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(writing, was important for mesopotamians)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(writing, was important to egyptians)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, was key invention for sumerians)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(writing, was important to egyptians)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(writing, was key invention for sumerians)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to egyptians)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(writing, was key invention for sumerians)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important in mesopotamia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important for mesopotamians)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to development of egypt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to mayans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to sumerians)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(writing, was key invention for sumerians)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to egyptians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important development to man)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was important development to man)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(writing, was important development to man)