writing: was important to development of egypt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to development of egypt 1.00
was in back then egypt 0.82
was important to egyptians 0.82
was important development to man 0.81
was important development to early man 0.78
was important to romans 0.76
was important in rise of europe 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, was important to development of egypt)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(writing, was in back then egypt)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(writing, was important to egyptians)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(writing, was in back then egypt)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(writing, was important to egyptians)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, was important development to man)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(writing, was important development to man)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(writing, was in back then egypt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to egyptians)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(writing, was important development to man)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(writing, was important development to early man)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(writing, was important development to early man)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(writing, was important to romans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(writing, was important development to early man)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(writing, was important to romans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(writing, was important in rise of europe)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(writing, was important in rise of europe)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to romans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(writing, was important in rise of europe)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(writing, was in back then egypt)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important development to man)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to egyptians)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important development to early man)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to romans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important in rise of europe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to development of egypt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(writing, was important to development of egypt)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(writing, was important to development of egypt)