writing: was important to mesopotamia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to sumerians 1.00
was important to mayans 1.00
was important to mesopotamia 1.00
was important in mesopotamia 0.99
was important for mesopotamians 0.98
was important to egyptians 0.86
was important in past 0.84
was needed 0.82
was important development to early man 0.82
was important development to man 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(writing, was important to mesopotamia)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was important to sumerians)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was important to mayans)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(writing, was important to sumerians)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(writing, was important in mesopotamia)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(writing, was important to mayans)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writing, was important in mesopotamia)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(writing, was important for mesopotamians)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writing, was important for mesopotamians)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to sumerians)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to mayans)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(writing, was important in mesopotamia)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(writing, was important for mesopotamians)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(writing, was important to egyptians)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(writing, was important to egyptians)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, was important in past)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(writing, was important in past)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(writing, was needed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(writing, was needed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to egyptians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(writing, was important development to early man)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, was important development to man)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(writing, was important development to early man)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(writing, was needed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(writing, was important development to man)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important in mesopotamia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(writing, was important in past)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important for mesopotamians)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(writing, was important development to early man)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(writing, was important development to man)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to mayans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to sumerians)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to egyptians)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important development to early man)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important in past)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important development to man)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(writing, was needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to mesopotamia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(writing, was important to mesopotamia)