xml: be better for e-commerce

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents database
Weight: 0.62
, standard
Weight: 0.61
, technology
Weight: 0.60
, programming language
Weight: 0.58
, tool
Weight: 0.57
Siblings css
Weight: 0.58
, php
Weight: 0.35
, perl
Weight: 0.35
, sql
Weight: 0.34
, ajax
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better for e-commerce 1.00
be better than json 0.80
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(database, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(standard, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(database, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(perl, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ajax, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(php, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(database, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(php, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(php, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ajax, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ajax, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(perl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(perl, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(xml, be better for e-commerce)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(xml, be better than json)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(xml, be better than json)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(xml, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(xml, be better than json)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(xml, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better than json)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(xml, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(standard, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(database, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(php, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ajax, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(perl, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(standard, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(database, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)