xml: be better than json

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents database
Weight: 0.62
, standard
Weight: 0.61
, technology
Weight: 0.60
, programming language
Weight: 0.58
, tool
Weight: 0.57
Siblings css
Weight: 0.58
, php
Weight: 0.35
, perl
Weight: 0.35
, sql
Weight: 0.34
, ajax
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than json 1.00
be better for e-commerce 0.80
be better than html 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(css, be better than html)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(css, be better than html) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(css, be better than html)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(xml, be better than json)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(xml, be better for e-commerce)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(xml, be better than html)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(xml, be better than html)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(xml, be better than html)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, be better for e-commerce)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better for e-commerce)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(xml, be better for e-commerce)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better than html)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better than json)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(xml, be better than json)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(xml, be better than json) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(css, be better than html)