yellow: were black green red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents color
Weight: 0.65
, name
Weight: 0.53
, curry
Weight: 0.51
, rose
Weight: 0.47
Siblings green
Weight: 0.59
, gray
Weight: 0.50
, red
Weight: 0.37
, purple
Weight: 0.36
, red line
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
were black red green 1.00
were black green red 1.00
were blue black green 0.98
were black green 0.98
were green red 0.97
were red green 0.97
were black red 0.96
were blue green 0.95
were red 0.92
were green 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(red, were green)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(red, were green)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(red, were green)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(yellow, were black green red)

Similarity expansion

0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(yellow, were black red green)
0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(yellow, were black red green)
0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(yellow, were black red green)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(yellow, were blue black green)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(yellow, were blue black green)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(yellow, were black green)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(yellow, were black green)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(yellow, were blue black green)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(yellow, were black green)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(yellow, were red)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(yellow, were red)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(yellow, were green)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(yellow, were green)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(yellow, were green)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(yellow, were red)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(yellow, were black red green)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(yellow, were blue black green)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(yellow, were black green)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(yellow, were green)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(yellow, were red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(yellow, were black green red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(yellow, were black green red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(yellow, were black green red)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(red, were green)