yellowstone national park: have great potential

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.93
, national parks
Weight: 0.83
, park
Weight: 0.80
, site
Weight: 0.71
, area
Weight: 0.68
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.42
, national forest
Weight: 0.41
, south park
Weight: 0.37
, amusement park
Weight: 0.37
, grand canyon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have great potential 1.00
have potential 0.93
have great potential for earthquakes 0.84
have potential for earthquakes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(national park, have potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, have great potential)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, have great potential)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(national park, have great potential for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, have great potential)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(national park, have potential for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, have great potential)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(national park, have great potential)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(national park, have potential)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(national park, have great potential for earthquakes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(national park, have potential for earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(national park, have great potential for earthquakes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(national park, have potential for earthquakes)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(national park, have great potential)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national park, have potential)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, have great potential)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(national park, have potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, have great potential)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(national park, have great potential for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, have great potential)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(national park, have potential for earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, have great potential)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(yellowstone national park, have great potential)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(yellowstone national park, have potential)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, have potential)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, have potential)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(yellowstone national park, have great potential for earthquakes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, have great potential for earthquakes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, have great potential for earthquakes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(yellowstone national park, have potential for earthquakes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, have potential for earthquakes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, have potential for earthquakes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential for earthquakes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have potential)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have potential for earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, have great potential)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(national park, have potential)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(national park, have great potential)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(national park, have great potential for earthquakes)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(national park, have potential for earthquakes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(national park, have great potential)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(national park, have potential)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(national park, have great potential for earthquakes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(yellowstone national park, have great potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(national park, have potential for earthquakes)