yellowstone national park: was formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.93
, national parks
Weight: 0.83
, park
Weight: 0.80
, site
Weight: 0.71
, area
Weight: 0.68
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.42
, national forest
Weight: 0.41
, south park
Weight: 0.37
, amusement park
Weight: 0.37
, grand canyon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed 1.00
was established 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, was formed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, was formed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(national park, was established)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, was formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(national park, was formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(park, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(national park, was established)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(national park, was established)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(national park, was formed)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(park, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, was formed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, was formed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(national park, was established)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, was formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(grand canyon, was formed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(grand canyon, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(yellowstone national park, was formed)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was established)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(yellowstone national park, was established)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, was established)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, was established)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(national park, was formed)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(park, was formed)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(national park, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(grand canyon, was formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(national park, was formed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(park, was formed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(national park, was established)